Home > News > đź“Š Key Indicator Method (KIM) : A Powerful Ergonomic Tool

Back

đź“Š Key Indicator Method (KIM) : A Powerful Ergonomic Tool

July 18th, 2025

🔤 What Does KIM Stand For?

KIM stands for Key Indicator Method. It is a practical and structured risk assessment tool used to evaluate physical workload and the potential development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Designed for use in real workplaces, KIM is particularly suitable for tasks involving manual lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling, or repetitive movements.

🏛️ Background and Context

Developed in the 1990s by the German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), the KIM method was created to offer a simple, reproducible, and standardized approach for assessing physical workload in various industries.

Over time, several tailored versions of KIM have emerged to address different types of physical tasks:

  • KIM-LHC: for lifting, holding, and carrying
  • KIM-PP: for pushing and pulling
  • KIM-MHO: for manual handling operations
  • KIM-MHO-R: for repetitive movements

Each version allows for targeted analysis of specific manual tasks, making KIM a versatile ergonomics assessment tool.

🧾 Key Definitions

To use the KIM method effectively, it’s important to understand the following terms:

  • Physical load: The biomechanical stress applied to the body during a task.
  • Load factors: Variables such as weight, posture, frequency, or duration that influence risk level.
  • Key indicators: Scoring elements assigned to each factor to calculate the overall risk.

🔢 KIM Scoring System

KIM provides a risk score based on various task parameters. The total score corresponds to one of four risk levels:

  • Low risk – no action needed
  • Moderate risk – improvement is recommended
  • High risk – corrective actions should be planned
  • Very high risk – immediate action is required

    This tiered system helps prioritize ergonomic interventions and supports data-driven decision-making in occupational health.

    🧩 Risk Factors Considered

    Depending on the version, KIM takes into account several physical and organizational factors, including:

    • Weight of the load
    • Frequency and duration of exertion
    • Body posture and movement patterns
    • Pushing or pulling forces
    • Horizontal and vertical distances
    • Environmental conditions
    • Work organization and recovery time

    These factors are assessed through an observation-based checklist, which generates a structured and repeatable risk profile.

    đź“‹ When and Where to Use KIM

    The KIM method can be applied in any setting where manual handling or repetitive physical tasks are performed. It is widely used in:

    • Manufacturing and assembly environments
    • Logistics and warehouse operations
    • Healthcare and elder care, especially for patient handling

    It is especially useful during workplace audits, risk assessments, or early ergonomic screenings, even for non-experts in biomechanics.

    ⚠️ Limitations of the KIM Method

    While KIM is a quick and easy method, it does come with certain limitations:

    • It is observation-based, and therefore subjective
    • It provides a general risk estimate, not a detailed biomechanical analysis
    • It may not capture the complexity of multitask or variable jobs

    However, due to its simplicity and structured nature, KIM remains a valuable screening tool for early risk detection and prioritization.

    🛠️ Step-by-Step Assessment Process

    The KIM method is applied in a few key steps:

    • Choose the appropriate KIM version based on the type of manual task
    • Observe the task in a representative working condition
    • Score each factor using the official KIM indicators
    • Calculate the total risk score
    • Interpret the result and propose preventive measures accordingly

      This process typically takes a few minutes per task, making KIM well suited for on-site evaluations.

      đź’Ľ Practical Use Cases

      • Warehouse picking: An employee lifts boxes weighing 10–15 kg, several times per minute. Using KIM-LHC, the assessment reveals a high-risk level due to frequency and posture.
      • Assembly line: A worker performs repetitive hand movements for over 4 hours/day. KIM-MHO-R highlights elevated risk to the upper limbs, guiding workstation redesign.
      • Hospital logistics: A healthcare worker pushes carts over long distances. KIM-PP shows excessive physical strain, suggesting equipment adjustments or workflow changes.

      🤖 Possible Integration into CAPTIV Score

      A future integration of the KIM method into CAPTIV Score could significantly enhance ergonomic risk assessments by combining motion capture data and automated scoring.

      With the help of inertial motion sensors (IMUs) and synchronized video, it would be possible to:

      • Automatically detect awkward postures and movement frequency
      • Measure load durations and distances more precisely
      • Use EMG sensors to estimate muscular effort
      • Automatically calculate KIM scores, risk levels, and prioritization

      Such a system could provide a more objective, faster, and more reproducible risk assessment, especially useful in complex or dynamic environments.

      👉 Are you using CAPTIV or considering KIM assessments in your workplace?
      We’re currently exploring the integration of the KIM method into CAPTIV Score.

      Contact us to express your interest or participate in pilot testing!